I'm ashamed that they would exploit such a situation for ratings, which is what putting such a controversial image on a major site is all about. It's insulting to the families that have lost loved ones, and it's humiliating to that boy's poor family: I can't imagine the anguish they are going through, knowing their son needed help, no one saw it, and that he caused so much pain.
And StarTribune followed CNN and posted the same image on their site. I wonder how many other news outlets did the same thing.
I cannot believe they were allowed, legally, to use any of it before a full investigation has taken place anyway. WTF?
no subject
I'm ashamed that they would exploit such a situation for ratings, which is what putting such a controversial image on a major site is all about. It's insulting to the families that have lost loved ones, and it's humiliating to that boy's poor family: I can't imagine the anguish they are going through, knowing their son needed help, no one saw it, and that he caused so much pain.
And StarTribune followed CNN and posted the same image on their site. I wonder how many other news outlets did the same thing.
I cannot believe they were allowed, legally, to use any of it before a full investigation has taken place anyway. WTF?