Date: 2005-06-09 05:32 am (UTC)
I agree with his 'pride is' statements, but not so much his 'pride is not' statements. I don't have [livejournal.com profile] unzeugmatic's reach of historical perspective, but it was kicked off by the stonewall riots. R I O T S. This was not about prayer circles and suits. The mattachine society tried that approach for years before the riots, and got nowhere. Pride is many things, but there are few things that it definitely isn't. Because it's inclusive.

I'm not entirely pride positive. But if there's any value to be had in it, I doubt declaring it to be a solemn gathering is going to be the road to political equality.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

July 2018

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
2223242526 2728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 29th, 2025 02:35 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios